CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 100/100 | 74/100 | 60/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | No data |
| MiMo-V2.5 | 100/100 | No data | 54/100 | 93/100 | 67/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.44/ 1M
$0.40/ 1M
Output
$1.32/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.08/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
4.1M
1.4M
Completed sessions
23,821,800
25,360,702
Token share
56.9%
8.48%
Tokens
280T+103%
42T+270%
JUL 12SEP 5
JUL 12SEP 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%419K user-weeks
71.9%19K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITDeepSeek V4 Flash·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITMiMo-V2.5·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902DeepSeek V4 Flash·Qwen3.8 Max 0902Related comparisonMiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902MiMo-V2.5·Qwen3.8 Max 0902